Abstract: Multinational enteprises are often accused of having a preference for investing in countries in which the working populations civil and political rights are largely disregarded. This paper presents an empirical investigation of the popular "political repression boosts FDI" hypothesis and arrives at the conclusion that the hypothesis is not supported. On the contrary, multinational enteprises rather appear to be attracted by countries in which civil and political freedom is respected.
Do Civil and Political Repression Really Boost Foreign Direct Investments?
Business and EntrepreneurshipCivil Liberties and Human RightsDefense and Foreign PolicyEconomyGlobal FinanceInternational Economics and DevelopmentLaw and LibertyTrade
Comments
Before posting, please read our Comment Policy.